Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Research in the Field of Anatomical Vegetative Organs of Cotton

Received: 8 June 2024     Accepted: 15 July 2024     Published: 26 September 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This article presents data from scientists who have studied and are currently studying the morphology and structural features of cotton peel. Information is provided on the shape, size, and ultrastructure of the seed surface, including the structure and height of the outer and inner integuments. The studies involved both cultivated varieties and accessions, as well as wild diploid and tetraploid species and their subspecies from various habitats. During the study, a cross-section of cotton leaves was also analyzed. The height and dimensions of the various tissues that make up the cotton leaf were determined. As a result, a pattern was identified that correlates with the tolerance of leaves to pests. And so, if the mesophyll structure has an isolateral type of structure, then the possibility of tolerance to piercing-sucking parasites increases. The studied representatives have a dorsiventral type of mesophyll. And this, in turn, does not help protect the leaf from the penetration of the aphid stylet into the spongy parenchyma and the sucking of nutrients from the sieve tubes of the vascular bundles located closer to the abaxial side of the leaf, as well as the mesophyll. transport cells rich in metabolic products. The height of the columnar parenchyma in all studied representatives is quite high, but it is possible that tolerance is influenced not by the thickness of the columnar layer itself, but by the difference between the thicknesses of the spongy and columnar parenchyma, and the thickness of the spongy parenchyma should not exceed 98.5 microns. Thus, that among the studied representatives, the most tolerant representatives to insect pests will be G. herbaceum ssp frutescens 2n=56, A-833 2n=56.

Published in Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12
Page(s) 32-38
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Seed of Structure, Cotton Plant, Wild Species, Hairiness of the Seed, Seed Integuments, Evolutionary Advancement, Diploid Species, Tetraploid Species

References
[1] Barykina R. P., Veselova T. D., Devyatov A. G., Dzhalilova H. Kh., Ilyina G. M., Chubatova N. V. Fundamentals of microtechnical research of botany. Reference guide. -. Moscow, 2000. -129 p.
[2] Bobrov A. V. Morphology and ultrastructure of Cephalotaxus seeds in connection with the problems of the genus system // Botanical Journal. - 2001. - № 5. - С. 50-65.
[3] Burlyaeva M. O. Comparative-anatomical characterization of seed rinds of species of Lathyrus r. in connection with its systematics // Problems of botany at the turn of XX-XXI centuries. Thes. doc. presented to the II (X) Congress of the Russian Botanical Society May 26-29, 1998. - C.-P., 1998. - т1. - 17с.
[4] Dariev A. S., Abdullaev A. A. Cotton: anatomy, morphology, origin. - Tashkent: Fan, 1985. - 303 с.
[5] Dilovar T. Khamraeva, Tutushkina Nina V., Rainer W. Bussmann, Olim K. Khojimatov. Leaf morphological and anatomical structure of pregenerativeindividuals of Ferula tadshikorum in ex situ conditions. / Acta Biologica Sibirica 7: 193-210 (2021)
[6] Fryxell P. A. A classification of Gossypium L. (Malvaceae) - Taxon: 1969. - v. 18. - № 5. - P. 585-591.
[7] Glen L. Ritchie, Craig W. Bednarz Cotton Growth and Development. Bulletin 1252, September, 2004. The University of Georgia and Ft. Valley State University.
[8] Klyat V. P. Structure of spermoderm of some species of Gossypium r. L.// Uzb. biol. zhurn. - 1983. - № 6. - С. 50-53.
[9] Klyat V. P., Berezina I. A. Structure and development of seed peel in representatives of the genus Gossypium L. (family Malvaceae). International Conference, St. Petersburg. - ST. PETERSBURG, 1997. - С. 70-71.
[10] Konstantinov N. N. Morphological and physiological bases of ontogenesis and phylogenesis of cotton. - Moscow: Nauka, 1967. - 298 с.
[11] Netolitzky Dr. T. Anatomic der Angiospermen - Samen. - Berlin, 1926. - 245 p.
[12] Raikova I. A., Kanash M. S. Development of embryo, seed skin and fiber of cotton. - Tashkent, 1936. - 50 с.
[13] Shahid, M. R., J. Farooq, A. Mahmood, F. Ilahi, M. Riaz, A. Shakeel, I. V. P. Mag and A. Farooq (2012). Seasonal occurance of sucking insect pest in cotton ecosystem of Punjab, Pakistan. Adv.Agri. Bot. 4: 26-30.
[14] Shamrov I. I. Integument of flowering plants: structural and evolutionary aspects.// Proceedings of the International Conference on Plant Anatomy and Morphology. - S.-P., 1997. - С. 372-373.
[15] Soomro, A. R., R. Anjum, G. H. Mallah, and M. A. Leghari (2001). Host plant resistance to insects in cotton at Central Cotton Research Institute, Sakaran Sindh, Pakistan. Pakistan J. Bot. 33: 641-645.
[16] Takhtajyan A. L. Comparative anatomy of seeds. - Leningrad: Nauka, 1988- 1991.
[17] Thomas R. Fasulo & H. A. Denmark. Two spotted spider mite. Featured Creatures. University of Florida / Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences (December 2009). Дата обращения 20 мая 2011. Архивировано 22 ноября 2012г.
[18] Tutushkina N. V. Feature structure of a cotton leaf as a Mechanism of protection against insect pests. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. Volume 13. Special Issue 6. 2022 Pages: 2187–2022
[19] Nina Tutushkina, Abdumavlyan Abdullaev, Ziroat Ernazarova. (2023). The Characterization of Anatomical Indices of Seed Coat Formation of Diploid and Tetraploid Representatives of the Genus Gossypium L. Journal of Plant Sciences, 11(3), 86-92.
[20] Z. M. Din, T. A. Malik, F. M. Azhar and M. Ashraf. Natural resistance against insect pests in cotton.// The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26(5): 2016, Page: 1346-1353 ISSN: 1018-7081.
[21] Абдуллаев А. А., Дариев А. С., Омельченко М. В., Клят В. П., Ризаева С. М., Сайдалиев С., Амантурдиев А. Б., Халикова М. Б. Атлас рода Gossypium. [Atlas of the genus Gossypium] – Ташкент: Фан, 2010. – 263с.
[22] Аксенов Е. С. Новый метод окрашивания растительных тканей для приготовления постоянных анатомических препаратов. [A new method of staining plant tissues for the preparation of permanent anatomical preparations] //. Биол. науки. 1967. №. 11. С. 125— 126.
[23] Анатомические методы исследования культурных растений (методические указания) [Anatomical methods for studying cultivated plants (guidelines)] / Под ред. Л. И. Орел. Л., 1989.
[24] Влияние геометрии замыкающих клеток на работу устьичного аппарата у растений [The influence of guard cell geometry on the functioning of the stomatal apparatus in plants] / Бауэр С. М., Иванова О. В., Крылова Е. Г., Паутов А. А., Сапач Ю. О. // VI Поляховские чтения. М., 2012. С. 303–306.
[25] Захваткин Ю. А. Акарология — наука о клещах: История развития. Современное состояние. Систематика: Учебное пособие. [Acarology - the science of ticks: History of development. Modern condition. Systematics: Textbook.]—М.: Книжный дом «ЛИБРОКОМ», 2012.— С. 121. — ISBN 978-5-397-02126-5.
[26] Ле Диуен Анх Факторы устойчивости диких и культивируемых представителей рода Gossypium L. к хлопковой тле (Aphis Gossypii Glov.) [Factors of resistance of wild and cultivated representatives of the genus Gossypium L. to cotton aphid (Aphis Gossypii Glov.)]: Автореф. дисс… канд. биол. наук. Ташкент, 1995. 23 с.
[27] Мирославов Е. А., Кравкина И. М. Сравнительная анатомия листа растений, произрастающих в горах на разных высотах [Comparative leaf anatomy of plants growing in the mountains at different altitudes]// Ботанический журнал: 1990. Т. 75. № 3. С. 368—375. Научная библиотека диссертаций и авторефератов disser Cat
[28] Паутов А. А., Васильева В. А. Роль формы основных клеток эпидермы в морфогенезе листа представителей Hamamelidaceae [The role of the shape of the main cells of the epidermis in the morphogenesis of leaves of representatives of Hamamelidaceae]// Бот. журн. 2010. Т. 95, № 3. С. 338–345.
[29] Паушева З. П. Практикум по цитологии растений. [Workshop on plant cytology] М.: Колос, 1988.
[30] Пермякова В. Н. Защита растений от вредителей и болезней. [Protection of plants from pests and diseases.] — Петрозаводск: Карелия, 1988. — ISBN 5—7545—0025—4.
[31] Радцев В. С, Осокин Б. С, Чистова Н. П. Способ определения количества клеток в растительных тканях [Method for determining the number of cells in plant tissues]: Авт. свид. № 510195 СССР, кл. А01 G7/00. 17.04.1974.
[32] Яковлев Г. П., Челомбитько В. А. Ботаника. [Botany] – СПб.: «Специальная литература», 2008.
[33] Agro archive of crops. National economic importance of cotton growing. Available from:
[34] Project "Integrated water resources management in the Fergana Valley". Under the section "Pest and disease controlcotton" Available from:
[35] Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Available from:
[36] Agro xxi. Cotton is an indispensable agricultural crop. Available from:
[37] BBC news. Russian version. Cotton picking in Uzbekistan: labor conscription? Available from:
[38] Britannica. Cotton - fibre and plant. Available from:
[39] Britannica. list of plants in the family Malvaceae Available from:
[40] N. V. Tutushkina Structura of ripe seed of wild diploid representatives of Gossypium L. July 2024 BIO Web of Conferences, 116.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Viktorovna, T. N., Aleksandrovna, S. V. (2024). Research in the Field of Anatomical Vegetative Organs of Cotton. Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, 9(2), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Viktorovna, T. N.; Aleksandrovna, S. V. Research in the Field of Anatomical Vegetative Organs of Cotton. Biomed. Stat. Inform. 2024, 9(2), 32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Viktorovna TN, Aleksandrovna SV. Research in the Field of Anatomical Vegetative Organs of Cotton. Biomed Stat Inform. 2024;9(2):32-38. doi: 10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12,
      author = {Tutushkina Nina Viktorovna and Safiulina Veronika Aleksandrovna},
      title = {Research in the Field of Anatomical Vegetative Organs of Cotton
    },
      journal = {Biomedical Statistics and Informatics},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {32-38},
      doi = {10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bsi.20240902.12},
      abstract = {This article presents data from scientists who have studied and are currently studying the morphology and structural features of cotton peel. Information is provided on the shape, size, and ultrastructure of the seed surface, including the structure and height of the outer and inner integuments. The studies involved both cultivated varieties and accessions, as well as wild diploid and tetraploid species and their subspecies from various habitats. During the study, a cross-section of cotton leaves was also analyzed. The height and dimensions of the various tissues that make up the cotton leaf were determined. As a result, a pattern was identified that correlates with the tolerance of leaves to pests. And so, if the mesophyll structure has an isolateral type of structure, then the possibility of tolerance to piercing-sucking parasites increases. The studied representatives have a dorsiventral type of mesophyll. And this, in turn, does not help protect the leaf from the penetration of the aphid stylet into the spongy parenchyma and the sucking of nutrients from the sieve tubes of the vascular bundles located closer to the abaxial side of the leaf, as well as the mesophyll. transport cells rich in metabolic products. The height of the columnar parenchyma in all studied representatives is quite high, but it is possible that tolerance is influenced not by the thickness of the columnar layer itself, but by the difference between the thicknesses of the spongy and columnar parenchyma, and the thickness of the spongy parenchyma should not exceed 98.5 microns. Thus, that among the studied representatives, the most tolerant representatives to insect pests will be G. herbaceum ssp frutescens 2n=56, A-833 2n=56.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Research in the Field of Anatomical Vegetative Organs of Cotton
    
    AU  - Tutushkina Nina Viktorovna
    AU  - Safiulina Veronika Aleksandrovna
    Y1  - 2024/09/26
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12
    T2  - Biomedical Statistics and Informatics
    JF  - Biomedical Statistics and Informatics
    JO  - Biomedical Statistics and Informatics
    SP  - 32
    EP  - 38
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2578-8728
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bsi.20240902.12
    AB  - This article presents data from scientists who have studied and are currently studying the morphology and structural features of cotton peel. Information is provided on the shape, size, and ultrastructure of the seed surface, including the structure and height of the outer and inner integuments. The studies involved both cultivated varieties and accessions, as well as wild diploid and tetraploid species and their subspecies from various habitats. During the study, a cross-section of cotton leaves was also analyzed. The height and dimensions of the various tissues that make up the cotton leaf were determined. As a result, a pattern was identified that correlates with the tolerance of leaves to pests. And so, if the mesophyll structure has an isolateral type of structure, then the possibility of tolerance to piercing-sucking parasites increases. The studied representatives have a dorsiventral type of mesophyll. And this, in turn, does not help protect the leaf from the penetration of the aphid stylet into the spongy parenchyma and the sucking of nutrients from the sieve tubes of the vascular bundles located closer to the abaxial side of the leaf, as well as the mesophyll. transport cells rich in metabolic products. The height of the columnar parenchyma in all studied representatives is quite high, but it is possible that tolerance is influenced not by the thickness of the columnar layer itself, but by the difference between the thicknesses of the spongy and columnar parenchyma, and the thickness of the spongy parenchyma should not exceed 98.5 microns. Thus, that among the studied representatives, the most tolerant representatives to insect pests will be G. herbaceum ssp frutescens 2n=56, A-833 2n=56.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Botany and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Tashkent State Pedagogical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

  • Faculty of Natural Sciences, Tashkent State Pedagogical University, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

  • Sections